What is Locus Standi?

Locus Standi is a platform for the dispute-resolution world. It brings together arbitration, mediation and adjudication events, jobs and internships, and landmark arbitral awards explained in plain English, alongside the qualifications and pathways into the field. It was established in London at LIDW26 by the alumni of Queen Mary University of London.

Can Locus Standi help me understand a dispute?

Yes. Locus Standi offers free dispute help: paste your contract's dispute-resolution clause and a short note on what happened, and it works out the type of dispute, the governing law, your options, the right forum to file in, and drafts a basic document to start from, all in plain English.

What is the agentic AI case officer?

Locus Standi's workspace includes an AI case officer that helps practitioners run their matters: tracking stages and deadlines, raising alerts, organising to-dos and documents, and drafting. It is built for arbitrators, mediators and the institutions that administer disputes.

Where can I find arbitration events and internships?

Locus Standi keeps a live calendar of arbitration, mediation and adjudication events with one-tap calendar export, and a board of arbitration jobs and internships from institutions including the PCA, ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and AIAC.

Unicon Limited v. Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (Ministry of Energy and Water) (II) (UNCITRAL)

Why it matters

This case illustrates the challenges of enforcing contractual rights against a state entity in a post-conflict setting, where the respondent failed to participate. The tribunal upheld jurisdiction over the state despite the ministry's separate legal personality, and awarded compensation for breach of an anticipated contract amendment, applying Afghan commercial law on interest.

Summary

Unicon Limited, a UK consultancy, contracted with Afghanistan's Ministry of Energy and Water (MEW) to advise on the CASA-1000 power project, funded by the World Bank. The contract was extended via amendments, but MEW delayed payments and refused to sign Amendment No. 4, allegedly due to Unicon's refusal to pay bribes. Unicon initiated UNCITRAL arbitration in Paris. MEW did not participate. The sole arbitrator found jurisdiction over both MEW and the State of Afghanistan. She held that MEW breached its obligation to conclude Amendment No. 4, awarding USD 444,807 as compensation, plus USD 444,807 for unpaid invoices under Amendment No. 3, with 6% simple interest. Claims for additional compensation for harassment and punitive damages were dismissed. The tribunal also awarded 70% of legal costs and full arbitration costs.

The detail

Parties: Unicon Limited v. Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (Ministry of Energy and Water) (II)

Case number: ICC Case No. UNC

Outcome: Claimant awarded USD 444,807 for unpaid invoice under Amendment No. 3, plus USD 444,807 compensation for breach of obligation to conclude Amendment No. 4, with interest and costs.

Quantum: USD 889,614 plus interest and costs

Applicable law: UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 2013; Afghan law (Commercial Code); Contract General and Special Conditions

Issues in play: Contractual obligations vs. alleged extortion and harassment; Afghan law on interest and punitive damages.

Read the full decision at italaw ↗

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board