SALINI IMPREGILO S.P.A. v ARGENTINE REPUBLIC (Decision on jurisdiction)
ICSID · Investment (ICSID and treaty) · International · 23 February 2018
Why it matters
SALINI IMPREGILO S.P.A. v ARGENTINE REPUBLIC is an investment-treaty arbitration, in which a foreign investor argued that a state had fallen short of the protections it had promised under a treaty. It is dated 23 February 2018. Disputes of this kind turn on the balance between an investor's protections and a state's freedom to regulate in the public interest. The tribunal's full reasoning, and any sum awarded, are set out in the original.
Summary
This is the decision on jurisdiction in SALINI IMPREGILO S.P.A. v ARGENTINE REPUBLIC, dated 23 February 2018. It is a published arbitration document, most often from an investment or commercial dispute, gathered into a public collection so that it can be read rather than lost from view. The matter proceeded administered by ICSID. The award is reproduced from the arbitration.org collection with that source named; the tribunal's reasoning, and any sum it ordered, are set out in the document itself.
The detail
Parties: SALINI IMPREGILO S.P.A. v ARGENTINE REPUBLIC
Case number: See arbitration.org record
Outcome: Decision on jurisdiction. The disposition is set out in the original.
Applicable law: The applicable arbitration rules and governing law; see the original.
Issues in play: The parties' substantive dispute, resolved by arbitration rather than in the courts.
Read the full decision at arbitration.org ↗
Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.