What is Locus Standi?

Locus Standi is a platform for the dispute-resolution world. It brings together arbitration, mediation and adjudication events, jobs and internships, and landmark arbitral awards explained in plain English, alongside the qualifications and pathways into the field. It was established in London at LIDW26 by the alumni of Queen Mary University of London.

Can Locus Standi help me understand a dispute?

Yes. Locus Standi offers free dispute help: paste your contract's dispute-resolution clause and a short note on what happened, and it works out the type of dispute, the governing law, your options, the right forum to file in, and drafts a basic document to start from, all in plain English.

What is the agentic AI case officer?

Locus Standi's workspace includes an AI case officer that helps practitioners run their matters: tracking stages and deadlines, raising alerts, organising to-dos and documents, and drafting. It is built for arbitrators, mediators and the institutions that administer disputes.

Where can I find arbitration events and internships?

Locus Standi keeps a live calendar of arbitration, mediation and adjudication events with one-tap calendar export, and a board of arbitration jobs and internships from institutions including the PCA, ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and AIAC.

OKKV (OKKB) and others v. Kyrgyz Republic (Arbitration at Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Industry (MCCI))

Why it matters

This award is a rare example of a domestic arbitration tribunal applying the 1997 CIS Convention on Protection of Investors' Rights to hold a state liable for uncompensated expropriation. It illustrates how regional investment treaties can be enforced through local arbitration institutions, and it underscores the principle that nationalization without compensation is unlawful under both international and constitutional law. The case also shows that individual co-investors (dolshchiki) can be protected as investors under the Convention.

Summary

In 2008, the Kyrgyz government selected OOO 'O.K.K.V.' as the winner of a tender to build a health-tourism complex on state-owned land. The company obtained a 49-year land lease and all necessary permits. It financed construction by collecting contributions from 17 individuals (dolshchiki) under Kyrgyz law share-building agreements. The total contributions amounted to USD 2,343,862. In July 2010, the interim government issued Decree No. 99 nationalizing the entire complex without any compensation. The company and the dolshchiki filed a claim against the Kyrgyz Republic at the Arbitration at the Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Industry (MCCI), relying on the 1997 CIS Convention on Protection of Investors' Rights. The tribunal found that the nationalization was unlawful because it violated Article 9 of the Convention (requiring adequate compensation) and Article 12 of the Kyrgyz Constitution (prohibiting uncompensated expropriation). The tribunal ordered the Kyrgyz Republic to pay USD 2,343,862 in compensation to the company (to be distributed to the dolshchiki), plus arbitration costs and legal fees. Claims for lost profits, compound interest, and moral damages were dismissed for lack of specification and non-payment of fees. The award is notable for applying a regional investment treaty in a domestic arbitration and for recognizing individual co-investors as protected investors.

The detail

Parties: OKKV (OKKB) and others v. Kyrgyz Republic

Case number: italaw/cases/2640

Outcome: The tribunal found the nationalization unlawful and ordered the Kyrgyz Republic to pay USD 2,343,862 in compensation to OOO 'O.K.K.V.' plus USD 32,107 in arbitration costs and USD 29,250 in legal fees. Claims for lost profits, compound interest, and moral damages were left unexamined.

Quantum: USD 2,343,862

Applicable law: Convention on Protection of Investors' Rights (1997); Kyrgyz Constitution; Russian Law on International Commercial Arbitration; MCCI Rules

Issues in play: The case involved a conflict between the Kyrgyz Republic's right to nationalize property in the public interest and the obligation under the 1997 Convention and the Kyrgyz Constitution to pay adequate compensation. The tribunal held that the nationalization decree violated both domestic and international law because no compensation was paid.

Read the full decision at italaw ↗

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board