What is Locus Standi?

Locus Standi is a platform for the dispute-resolution world. It brings together arbitration, mediation and adjudication events, jobs and internships, and landmark arbitral awards explained in plain English, alongside the qualifications and pathways into the field. It was established in London at LIDW26 by the alumni of Queen Mary University of London.

Can Locus Standi help me understand a dispute?

Yes. Locus Standi offers free dispute help: paste your contract's dispute-resolution clause and a short note on what happened, and it works out the type of dispute, the governing law, your options, the right forum to file in, and drafts a basic document to start from, all in plain English.

What is the agentic AI case officer?

Locus Standi's workspace includes an AI case officer that helps practitioners run their matters: tracking stages and deadlines, raising alerts, organising to-dos and documents, and drafting. It is built for arbitrators, mediators and the institutions that administer disputes.

Where can I find arbitration events and internships?

Locus Standi keeps a live calendar of arbitration, mediation and adjudication events with one-tap calendar export, and a board of arbitration jobs and internships from institutions including the PCA, ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and AIAC.

Latin American Regional Aviation Holding S. de R.L. v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay (ICSID)

Why it matters

This award is significant for its detailed analysis of the fair and equitable treatment standard in the context of state interference with a struggling airline. It clarifies the boundary between legitimate regulatory action and expropriation, and underscores the importance of protecting minority shareholders' investments. The tribunal's rejection of jurisdictional objections and its nuanced approach to quantum, awarding only a fraction of the claimed amount, also provide guidance on valuation in investor-state disputes.

Summary

The dispute arose from Uruguay's alleged mistreatment of Pluna, a state-owned airline that was partially privatized. The claimant, LARAH, a Panamanian holding company, invested in Pluna through a series of transactions. After financial difficulties, Uruguay took measures that LARAH claimed amounted to expropriation and unfair treatment, including a public campaign, pressure on fuel supplier ANCAP, and ultimately the liquidation of Pluna. The tribunal, constituted under ICSID, had to decide jurisdiction, liability, and quantum. It rejected Uruguay's jurisdictional objections, finding LARAH had standing as an investor. On the merits, the tribunal held that Uruguay violated the fair and equitable treatment standard and expropriated LARAH's investment without compensation. The tribunal awarded US$30 million in damages, significantly less than the claimed US$485 million, applying a discounted cash flow method with adjustments. The award also included interest and partial costs. The case is notable for its thorough examination of state responsibility in the context of a failing enterprise and the limits of investor protection.

The detail

Parties: Latin American Regional Aviation Holding S. de R.L. v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay

Case number: ICSID Case No. ARB/19/16

Outcome: Tribunal found Uruguay violated fair and equitable treatment and expropriation obligations; ordered payment of US$30 million plus interest and costs.

Quantum: US$30,000,000

Applicable law: Panama-Uruguay Bilateral Investment Treaty (2002); ICSID Convention; ICSID Arbitration Rules

Issues in play: The case involved the fair and equitable treatment standard and expropriation under the BIT, with the tribunal assessing whether Uruguay's actions (including a campaign against the airline, financial pressure, and eventual liquidation) breached these protections.

Read the full decision at italaw ↗

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board