What is Locus Standi?

Locus Standi is a platform for the dispute-resolution world. It brings together arbitration, mediation and adjudication events, jobs and internships, and landmark arbitral awards explained in plain English, alongside the qualifications and pathways into the field. It was established in London at LIDW26 by the alumni of Queen Mary University of London.

Can Locus Standi help me understand a dispute?

Yes. Locus Standi offers free dispute help: paste your contract's dispute-resolution clause and a short note on what happened, and it works out the type of dispute, the governing law, your options, the right forum to file in, and drafts a basic document to start from, all in plain English.

What is the agentic AI case officer?

Locus Standi's workspace includes an AI case officer that helps practitioners run their matters: tracking stages and deadlines, raising alerts, organising to-dos and documents, and drafting. It is built for arbitrators, mediators and the institutions that administer disputes.

Where can I find arbitration events and internships?

Locus Standi keeps a live calendar of arbitration, mediation and adjudication events with one-tap calendar export, and a board of arbitration jobs and internships from institutions including the PCA, ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and AIAC.

Juvel and Bithell v. Poland (ICC International Court of Arbitration)

Why it matters

Part of the ICC International Court of Arbitration's published caseload, released through the ICC and Jus Mundi transparency partnership. Juvel and Bithell v. Poland (ICC Case No. 19459/MHM), partial final award of 26 February 2019. It matters less as a single landmark than as part of the open record of how the world's leading commercial arbitral institution decides cross-border disputes under the ICC Rules: a worked, citable example for research into ICC practice, drafting and tribunal reasoning, with the full text at the linked original.

Summary

Juvel and Bithell v. Poland: an ICC commercial arbitration administered by the ICC International Court of Arbitration (ICC Case No. 19459/MHM), partial final award dated 26 February 2019. The decision is published in full and free of charge under the ICC and Jus Mundi transparency partnership, which since 1 January 2019 has made publishable ICC Court awards openly available to the global legal community. This entry links directly to the original document, where the tribunal's reasoning, the procedural history and the operative orders are set out in full. ICC commercial awards of this kind turn on the parties' contract and the substantive law they chose, applied under the ICC Rules of Arbitration; party names are pseudonymised by ICC where the parties have not consented to being named, while the legal analysis stays public. For a student or practitioner this is a primary source rather than a summary: the authoritative record of what the tribunal decided, and why, is the published award itself, reachable from the link on this entry.

The detail

Parties: Juvel and Bithell v. Poland

Case number: ICC Case No. 19459/MHM

Applicable law: ICC Rules of Arbitration; the substantive governing law is stated in the published award.

Read the full decision at Jus Mundi (ICC partnership) ↗

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board