What is Locus Standi?

Locus Standi is a platform for the dispute-resolution world. It brings together arbitration, mediation and adjudication events, jobs and internships, and landmark arbitral awards explained in plain English, alongside the qualifications and pathways into the field. It was established in London at LIDW26 by the alumni of Queen Mary University of London.

Can Locus Standi help me understand a dispute?

Yes. Locus Standi offers free dispute help: paste your contract's dispute-resolution clause and a short note on what happened, and it works out the type of dispute, the governing law, your options, the right forum to file in, and drafts a basic document to start from, all in plain English.

What is the agentic AI case officer?

Locus Standi's workspace includes an AI case officer that helps practitioners run their matters: tracking stages and deadlines, raising alerts, organising to-dos and documents, and drafting. It is built for arbitrators, mediators and the institutions that administer disputes.

Where can I find arbitration events and internships?

Locus Standi keeps a live calendar of arbitration, mediation and adjudication events with one-tap calendar export, and a board of arbitration jobs and internships from institutions including the PCA, ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and AIAC.

Joseph Charles Lemire v. Ukraine (ICSID)

Why it matters

This case is a landmark for its detailed analysis of the Fair and Equitable Treatment standard, particularly the role of legitimate expectations in investment treaty arbitration. It also addressed causation in damages, moral damages, and the allocation of costs, setting a precedent for how tribunals assess the link between state conduct and investor losses.

Summary

Joseph Charles Lemire, a US investor, owned Gala Radio, a Ukrainian radio company. He claimed Ukraine violated the US-Ukraine BIT by denying Gala Radio frequencies, imposing excessive local music quotas, and harassing the company through inspections. In a prior decision, the tribunal found Ukraine breached the FET standard by failing to ensure a transparent and predictable regulatory environment, particularly during a period when the National Council was not operative (the 'Interregnum'). In this final award, the tribunal quantified damages. It rejected Ukraine's argument that Lemire's losses were not caused by the breaches, finding a causal link between the denial of frequencies and Gala Radio's lost profits. Using a discounted cash flow analysis, the tribunal awarded USD 8,717,850. It denied moral damages, finding no exceptional circumstances. Costs were partially awarded to Lemire. The award includes a dissenting opinion by Dr. Voss on damages and costs.

The detail

Parties: Joseph Charles Lemire v. Ukraine

Case number: ICSID Case No. ARB/06/18

Outcome: Ukraine ordered to pay Claimant USD 8,717,850 as compensation for violation of the Fair and Equitable Treatment standard, plus USD 750,000 in costs and interest.

Quantum: 8,717,850 USD

Applicable law: Treaty between the United States of America and Ukraine concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (1996); ICSID Convention; International Law Commission Articles on State Responsibility.

Issues in play: The Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) standard under the US-Ukraine BIT was central. The tribunal interpreted the FET standard to include protection of legitimate expectations and a stable regulatory framework, rejecting Ukraine's argument that the BIT's Annex allowed discriminatory measures.

Read the full decision at italaw ↗

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board