What is Locus Standi?

Locus Standi is a platform for the dispute-resolution world. It brings together arbitration, mediation and adjudication events, jobs and internships, and landmark arbitral awards explained in plain English, alongside the qualifications and pathways into the field. It was established in London at LIDW26 by the alumni of Queen Mary University of London.

Can Locus Standi help me understand a dispute?

Yes. Locus Standi offers free dispute help: paste your contract's dispute-resolution clause and a short note on what happened, and it works out the type of dispute, the governing law, your options, the right forum to file in, and drafts a basic document to start from, all in plain English.

What is the agentic AI case officer?

Locus Standi's workspace includes an AI case officer that helps practitioners run their matters: tracking stages and deadlines, raising alerts, organising to-dos and documents, and drafting. It is built for arbitrators, mediators and the institutions that administer disputes.

Where can I find arbitration events and internships?

Locus Standi keeps a live calendar of arbitration, mediation and adjudication events with one-tap calendar export, and a board of arbitration jobs and internships from institutions including the PCA, ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and AIAC.

Gould v Evolve Media (IMPRESS scheme) (IMPRESS)

Why it matters

Shows the scheme delivering a remedy a claimant often wants more than money: a forced public apology and retraction on the same platforms that carried the article, alongside modest damages.

Summary

This is a press-arbitration decision under the IMPRESS scheme, Jonny Gould (Claimant) v Evolve Media Limited (Respondent), dated May 2018. The scheme offers a low-cost alternative to a libel action in the High Court, letting a complaint against a regulated publisher be decided by an arbitrator appointed through CIArb. The full award, with its findings and any remedy, is set out in the original, linked here.

The detail

Parties: Jonny Gould (Claimant) v Evolve Media Limited (Respondent)

Case number: IMPRESS Arbitration Scheme Case No. 132130205

Outcome: Defamation upheld: £900 damages plus a full published apology and retraction on the website and Twitter.

Quantum: £900

Applicable law: Arbitration Act 1996; English defamation law; the CIArb/IMPRESS arbitration scheme rules.

Issues in play: An individual's reputation against a publisher's article, with the remedy weighed for proportionality, again through the IMPRESS scheme rather than the courts.

Read the full decision at IMPRESS ↗

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board