What is Locus Standi?

Locus Standi is a platform for the dispute-resolution world. It brings together arbitration, mediation and adjudication events, jobs and internships, and landmark arbitral awards explained in plain English, alongside the qualifications and pathways into the field. It was established in London at LIDW26 by the alumni of Queen Mary University of London.

Can Locus Standi help me understand a dispute?

Yes. Locus Standi offers free dispute help: paste your contract's dispute-resolution clause and a short note on what happened, and it works out the type of dispute, the governing law, your options, the right forum to file in, and drafts a basic document to start from, all in plain English.

What is the agentic AI case officer?

Locus Standi's workspace includes an AI case officer that helps practitioners run their matters: tracking stages and deadlines, raising alerts, organising to-dos and documents, and drafting. It is built for arbitrators, mediators and the institutions that administer disputes.

Where can I find arbitration events and internships?

Locus Standi keeps a live calendar of arbitration, mediation and adjudication events with one-tap calendar export, and a board of arbitration jobs and internships from institutions including the PCA, ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and AIAC.

Eco Oro Minerals Corp. v. Republic of Colombia (ICSID)

Why it matters

This case is significant for its treatment of the tension between environmental protection and investor rights under international investment law. The Tribunal's majority decision upheld a breach of the minimum standard of treatment while rejecting expropriation, illustrating the nuanced approach to balancing state regulatory power and investment protection. It also addresses the valuation of mining concessions affected by environmental measures.

Summary

Eco Oro Minerals Corp., a Canadian mining company, held a concession contract for gold and silver exploration in Colombia's Santurbán region. Colombia adopted measures to protect the páramo ecosystem, which Eco Oro argued destroyed its investment. The Tribunal found jurisdiction under the Canada-Colombia FTA. By a majority, it dismissed the expropriation claim (Article 811) but upheld the minimum standard of treatment claim (Article 805), finding that Colombia's actions were arbitrary and unreasonable. The Tribunal ordered damages, to be determined in a subsequent phase, net of Colombian taxes. The case highlights the balance between environmental regulation and investor protection, and the standard for indirect expropriation and fair and equitable treatment.

The detail

Parties: Eco Oro Minerals Corp. v. Republic of Colombia

Case number: ICSID Case No. ARB/16/41

Outcome: The Tribunal awarded Eco Oro damages for breach of the minimum standard of treatment under Article 805 of the Canada-Colombia FTA, but dismissed the expropriation claim. The quantum of damages is not specified in the provided text.

Applicable law: Canada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement (FTA), Articles 805 and 811; ICSID Convention

Issues in play: The case involved a collision between Colombia's environmental protection measures for the Santurbán páramo and the investor's rights under the FTA, specifically the minimum standard of treatment and expropriation provisions.

Read the full decision at italaw ↗

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board