What is Locus Standi?

Locus Standi is a platform for the dispute-resolution world. It brings together arbitration, mediation and adjudication events, jobs and internships, and landmark arbitral awards explained in plain English, alongside the qualifications and pathways into the field. It was established in London at LIDW26 by the alumni of Queen Mary University of London.

Can Locus Standi help me understand a dispute?

Yes. Locus Standi offers free dispute help: paste your contract's dispute-resolution clause and a short note on what happened, and it works out the type of dispute, the governing law, your options, the right forum to file in, and drafts a basic document to start from, all in plain English.

What is the agentic AI case officer?

Locus Standi's workspace includes an AI case officer that helps practitioners run their matters: tracking stages and deadlines, raising alerts, organising to-dos and documents, and drafting. It is built for arbitrators, mediators and the institutions that administer disputes.

Where can I find arbitration events and internships?

Locus Standi keeps a live calendar of arbitration, mediation and adjudication events with one-tap calendar export, and a board of arbitration jobs and internships from institutions including the PCA, ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and AIAC.

Crystallex International Corporation v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID)

Why it matters

This award is a landmark in investment treaty arbitration for its detailed analysis of fair and equitable treatment and expropriation in the context of mining permits. It set a precedent for assessing damages based on discounted cash flow analysis and confirmed that a state's failure to process permits in a transparent and consistent manner can breach the BIT. The award also addressed the valuation date and interest calculations, influencing subsequent cases.

Summary

Crystallex, a Canadian mining company, invested in the Las Cristinas gold project in Venezuela. After years of development, Venezuela denied a necessary environmental permit in 2008 and later rescinded the mining contract in 2011. Crystallex initiated arbitration under the Canada-Venezuela BIT. The tribunal found that Venezuela breached the fair and equitable treatment standard by creating legitimate expectations through its conduct and then frustrating them arbitrarily. It also held that the denial of the permit and contract rescission amounted to expropriation without compensation. The tribunal awarded Crystallex US$1,202 million in damages, calculated as the fair market value of the investment at the date of expropriation (April 2008), plus pre- and post-award interest. The decision is significant for its thorough treatment of the fair and equitable treatment standard, the calculation of damages in expropriation cases, and the allocation of costs.

The detail

Parties: Crystallex International Corporation v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

Case number: ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/11/2

Outcome: Venezuela breached fair and equitable treatment and expropriated Crystallex's investment; ordered to pay US$1,202 million in damages plus interest.

Quantum: US$1,202 million

Applicable law: Agreement between Canada and Venezuela for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (1996 BIT); ICSID Additional Facility Rules

Issues in play: The case involved the fair and equitable treatment standard and expropriation under the Canada-Venezuela BIT, with Venezuela's denial of a mining permit and rescission of a contract at issue.

Read the full decision at italaw ↗

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board