Claimant v. Respondent

Why it matters

Part of the ICC International Court of Arbitration's published caseload, released through the ICC and Jus Mundi transparency partnership. Claimant v. Respondent (ICC Case No. 23605/DDA/TO), partial award of 19 November 2018. It matters less as a single landmark than as part of the open record of how the world's leading commercial arbitral institution decides cross-border disputes under the ICC Rules: a worked, citable example for research into ICC practice, drafting and tribunal reasoning, with the full text at the linked original.

Summary

Claimant v. Respondent: an ICC commercial arbitration administered by the ICC International Court of Arbitration (ICC Case No. 23605/DDA/TO), partial award dated 19 November 2018. The decision is published in full and free of charge under the ICC and Jus Mundi transparency partnership, which since 1 January 2019 has made publishable ICC Court awards openly available to the global legal community. This entry links directly to the original document, where the tribunal's reasoning, the procedural history and the operative orders are set out in full. ICC commercial awards of this kind turn on the parties' contract and the substantive law they chose, applied under the ICC Rules of Arbitration; party names are pseudonymised by ICC where the parties have not consented to being named, while the legal analysis stays public. For a student or practitioner this is a primary source rather than a summary: the authoritative record of what the tribunal decided, and why, is the published award itself, reachable from the link on this entry.

The detail

Parties: Claimant v. Respondent

Case number: ICC Case No. 23605/DDA/TO

Applicable law: ICC Rules of Arbitration; the substantive governing law is stated in the published award.

Read the full decision at Jus Mundi (ICC partnership) ↗

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board