What is Locus Standi?

Locus Standi is a platform for the dispute-resolution world. It brings together arbitration, mediation and adjudication events, jobs and internships, and landmark arbitral awards explained in plain English, alongside the qualifications and pathways into the field. It was established in London at LIDW26 by the alumni of Queen Mary University of London.

Can Locus Standi help me understand a dispute?

Yes. Locus Standi offers free dispute help: paste your contract's dispute-resolution clause and a short note on what happened, and it works out the type of dispute, the governing law, your options, the right forum to file in, and drafts a basic document to start from, all in plain English.

What is the agentic AI case officer?

Locus Standi's workspace includes an AI case officer that helps practitioners run their matters: tracking stages and deadlines, raising alerts, organising to-dos and documents, and drafting. It is built for arbitrators, mediators and the institutions that administer disputes.

Where can I find arbitration events and internships?

Locus Standi keeps a live calendar of arbitration, mediation and adjudication events with one-tap calendar export, and a board of arbitration jobs and internships from institutions including the PCA, ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and AIAC.

CAS 2021 A 8018 (CAS)

Why it matters

This case clarifies the burden on clubs to prove that a national dispute resolution system meets FIFA's minimum standards of independence, impartiality, and fair process. It reinforces that the FIFA DRC retains default jurisdiction unless the national body demonstrates full compliance, including at the appellate level. The decision underscores the importance of transparent and equitable arbitration mechanisms in football.

Summary

Cape Town City FC terminated the employment contract of player Christofer David, citing retrenchment due to COVID-19. The player challenged the termination before FIFA's Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC), which found the club had terminated without just cause and awarded compensation. The club appealed to CAS, arguing that FIFA lacked jurisdiction because the dispute should have been heard by the National Soccer League Dispute Resolution Chamber (NSL DRC) under South African law. The club claimed the NSL DRC was an independent and impartial tribunal meeting FIFA standards. However, the CAS Sole Arbitrator found that the club failed to prove that the SAFA Arbitration Tribunal (the appellate body) complied with FIFA Circular 1010 requirements, particularly regarding equal representation, independence, and procedural guarantees. Since the national system's compliance could not be verified, FIFA DRC properly exercised its default jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed, and the original decision confirmed.

The detail

Parties: Cape Town City Football Club v. Christofer David & FIFA

Case number: CAS 2021 A 8018

Outcome: Appeal dismissed; FIFA DRC decision confirmed; Club ordered to pay CHF 8,000 to Player towards costs.

Quantum: CHF 8,000

Applicable law: FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP), CAS Code of Sports-related Arbitration, Swiss Civil Code

Issues in play: Whether the national dispute resolution mechanism (NSL DRC and SAFA Arbitration Tribunal) complied with FIFA minimum standards, thereby ousting FIFA DRC jurisdiction.

Read the full decision at Court of Arbitration for Sport (football, via FIFA) ↗

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board