CAS 2020 A 6879
CAS · Football (FIFA / CAS) · Switzerland · 7 Sept 2021
Why it matters
This case reinforces the Talca doctrine that a creditor who fails to participate in bankruptcy proceedings of a former club cannot later obtain disciplinary sanctions against a sporting successor. It clarifies that the due diligence requirement is a prerequisite for imposing sanctions, even when sporting succession is established. The decision balances the continuity of sporting identity with the need for creditors to act proactively in insolvency situations.
Summary
The case concerns an appeal by football agent Joaquín Bárcena Uriarte against a FIFA Disciplinary Committee decision that dismissed charges against PFC CSKA-Sofia (New CSKA) for failing to pay a debt owed by the original CSKA (Original CSKA), which had gone bankrupt. The debt arose from a 2012 contract for the agent's services in signing a player. In 2014, FIFA ordered Original CSKA to pay €40,000, but the club entered insolvency in 2015. The agent did not file a claim in the Bulgarian bankruptcy proceedings. Later, New CSKA was created, using the same name, colours, logo, stadium, and history as Original CSKA. The FIFA Disciplinary Committee found that New CSKA was the sporting successor of Original CSKA but refused to impose sanctions because the agent had failed to participate in the bankruptcy proceedings, citing CAS jurisprudence (Talca case) that a creditor must act diligently. The agent appealed to CAS, arguing he was not required to participate in bankruptcy and that the trustee's negligence prevented him from doing so. The CAS Sole Arbitrator upheld the FIFA decision, holding that the agent knew or should have known of the bankruptcy by October 2015 at the latest, yet did not file a claim. Following the Talca principle, the creditor's inaction contributed to the non-payment, so no disciplinary sanctions could be imposed on the successor club. The appeal was dismissed.
The detail
Parties: Joaquín Bárcena Uriarte v. PFC CSKA-Sofia EAD & FIFA
Case number: CAS 2020 A 6879
Outcome: Appeal dismissed; New CSKA not liable to pay debt because Agent failed to claim in bankruptcy proceedings.
Applicable law: FIFA Disciplinary Code (2011 and 2019 editions), CAS jurisprudence on sporting succession and creditor diligence.
Issues in play: The principle of sporting succession (club identity transcends legal entities) versus the requirement that a creditor must diligently pursue claims in bankruptcy proceedings before seeking disciplinary sanctions against a successor club.
Read the full decision at Court of Arbitration for Sport (football, via FIFA) ↗
Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.