What is Locus Standi?

Locus Standi is a platform for the dispute-resolution world. It brings together arbitration, mediation and adjudication events, jobs and internships, and landmark arbitral awards explained in plain English, alongside the qualifications and pathways into the field. It was established in London at LIDW26 by the alumni of Queen Mary University of London.

Can Locus Standi help me understand a dispute?

Yes. Locus Standi offers free dispute help: paste your contract's dispute-resolution clause and a short note on what happened, and it works out the type of dispute, the governing law, your options, the right forum to file in, and drafts a basic document to start from, all in plain English.

What is the agentic AI case officer?

Locus Standi's workspace includes an AI case officer that helps practitioners run their matters: tracking stages and deadlines, raising alerts, organising to-dos and documents, and drafting. It is built for arbitrators, mediators and the institutions that administer disputes.

Where can I find arbitration events and internships?

Locus Standi keeps a live calendar of arbitration, mediation and adjudication events with one-tap calendar export, and a board of arbitration jobs and internships from institutions including the PCA, ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and AIAC.

CAS 2020 A 6690 (CAS)

Why it matters

This case clarifies the strict interpretation of 'country' in FIFA Statutes, requiring an independent state recognized by the international community. It confirms that Article 11 para. 6 (for regions not yet independent) requires imminent independence, not just consent from the parent association. The award also addresses the limits of estoppel and equal treatment in sports governance, reinforcing FIFA's discretion in membership decisions.

Summary

The Bonaire Football Federation (BFF), a special municipality of the Netherlands, applied for full FIFA membership in June 2019. FIFA rejected the application, stating Bonaire is not an independent state recognized by the international community, as required by Article 11 para. 1 of the FIFA Statutes. BFF argued that Article 11 para. 6 allows membership for regions not yet independent with the consent of the parent association (KNVB), and that FIFA had previously admitted Curaçao (a similar territory) in 2011. BFF also claimed discrimination, estoppel, and violation of personality rights. The CAS Panel held that Article 11 para. 6 requires the territory to be on a clear path to independence, which Bonaire is not. The Panel distinguished Curaçao's case, finding that Curaçao's federation was a continuation of the former Netherlands Antilles football body, not a new admission. The Panel rejected the estoppel argument due to the 8-year delay and lack of reasonable reliance. It also found no violation of personality rights, as BFF had no right to membership if conditions were not met. The appeal was dismissed, and BFF was ordered to pay arbitration costs.

The detail

Parties: Bonaire Football Federation v. FIFA

Case number: CAS 2020 A 6690

Outcome: Appeal dismissed; FIFA's rejection of BFF's membership application confirmed; BFF to bear arbitration costs.

Applicable law: FIFA Statutes, Regulations Governing the Admission of Associations to FIFA, Swiss Civil Code (SCC), CAS Code of Sports-related Arbitration

Issues in play: Interpretation of 'country' under FIFA Statutes (Art. 11 para. 1) vs. special provision for non-independent regions (Art. 11 para. 6); principles of equal treatment, estoppel, and personality rights under Swiss law.

Read the full decision at Court of Arbitration for Sport (football, via FIFA) ↗

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board