CAS 2019/A/6225 Ines Henriques, Claire Woods, Paola Perez, Johana Ordonez, Magaly Bonilla, Ainhoa Pinedo, Erin Taylor-Talcott, Quentin Rew v. International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), International Olympic Committee (IOC)
Court of Arbitration for Sport · Sports (CAS) · International (Switzerland) · 03/02/2020
Why it matters
Ines Henriques, Claire Woods, Paola Perez, Johana Ordonez, Magaly Bonilla, Ainhoa Pinedo, Erin Taylor-Talcott, Quentin Rew v. International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), International Olympic Committee (IOC), a sports dispute in athletics decided by the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, the final tribunal of world sport. The Court held that CAS found it had no jurisdiction. For a student, it is an example of how CAS resolves disputes as the final tribunal of world sport, applying the relevant federation rules and Swiss law.
Summary
Ines Henriques, Claire Woods, Paola Perez, Johana Ordonez, Magaly Bonilla, Ainhoa Pinedo, Erin Taylor-Talcott, Quentin Rew v. International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), International Olympic Committee (IOC): a sports dispute in athletics before the Court of Arbitration for Sport, decided 03/02/2020. The Court held that CAS found it had no jurisdiction. The full award is available from CAS.
The detail
Parties: Ines Henriques, Claire Woods, Paola Perez, Johana Ordonez, Magaly Bonilla, Ainhoa Pinedo, Erin Taylor-Talcott, Quentin Rew v. International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), International Olympic Committee (IOC)
Case number: CAS 2019/A/6225
Outcome: Jurisdiction denied
Applicable law: The relevant federation regulations; Swiss law; the CAS Code.
Issues in play: a sports dispute
Read the full decision at Court of Arbitration for Sport ↗
Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.