CAS 2017/A/5163 Hamad Kalkaba Malboum v. Association of National Olympic Committees of Africa (ANOCA)
Court of Arbitration for Sport · Sports (CAS) · International (Switzerland) · 25/05/2018
Why it matters
Hamad Kalkaba Malboum v. Association of National Olympic Committees of Africa (ANOCA), a governance dispute decided by the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, the final tribunal of world sport. The Court held that the appeal was upheld. For a student, it shows how CAS resolves disputes over the governance of sport, the rules, elections and powers of federations.
Summary
Hamad Kalkaba Malboum v. Association of National Olympic Committees of Africa (ANOCA): a governance dispute before the Court of Arbitration for Sport, decided 25/05/2018. The Court held that the appeal was upheld. The full award is available from CAS.
The detail
Parties: Hamad Kalkaba Malboum v. Association of National Olympic Committees of Africa (ANOCA)
Case number: CAS 2017/A/5163
Outcome: Upheld
Applicable law: The relevant federation regulations; Swiss law; the CAS Code.
Issues in play: a governance dispute
Read the full decision at Court of Arbitration for Sport ↗
Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.