CAS 2016/H/018 Kiril Sveshnikov, Dmitry Sokolov, Dmitry Strakhov v. Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI)
Court of Arbitration for Sport · Sports (CAS) · International (Switzerland) · 05/08/2016
Why it matters
Kiril Sveshnikov, Dmitry Sokolov, Dmitry Strakhov v. Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI), an eligibility dispute in cycling decided by the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, the final tribunal of world sport. The Court held that the appeal was dismissed. For a student, it shows how CAS balances a federation's rules on who may compete against the athlete's rights.
Summary
Kiril Sveshnikov, Dmitry Sokolov, Dmitry Strakhov v. Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI): an eligibility dispute in cycling before the Court of Arbitration for Sport, decided 05/08/2016. The Court held that the appeal was dismissed. The full award is available from CAS.
The detail
Parties: Kiril Sveshnikov, Dmitry Sokolov, Dmitry Strakhov v. Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI)
Case number: CAS 2016/H/018
Outcome: Dismissed
Applicable law: The relevant federation regulations; Swiss law; the CAS Code.
Issues in play: an eligibility dispute
Read the full decision at Court of Arbitration for Sport ↗
Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.