Award

CAS 2013/A/3080 Alemitu Bekele Degfa v. International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), Turkish Athletics Federation (TAF)

Court of Arbitration for Sport · Sports (CAS) · International (Switzerland) · 14/03/2013

Why it matters

Alemitu Bekele Degfa v. International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), Turkish Athletics Federation (TAF), an anti-doping case in athletics decided by the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, the final tribunal of world sport. The Court held that the appeal was partially upheld. For a student, it shows how CAS applies the World Anti-Doping Code: the athlete bears a heavy burden to explain an adverse finding, and CAS reviews both the science and the sanction afresh.

Summary

Alemitu Bekele Degfa v. International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), Turkish Athletics Federation (TAF): an anti-doping case in athletics before the Court of Arbitration for Sport, decided 14/03/2013. The Court held that the appeal was partially upheld. The full award is available from CAS.

The detail

Parties: Alemitu Bekele Degfa v. International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), Turkish Athletics Federation (TAF)

Case number: CAS 2013/A/3080

Outcome: Partially Upheld

Applicable law: The relevant federation regulations; Swiss law; the CAS Code.

Issues in play: an anti-doping case

Read the full decision at Court of Arbitration for Sport

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board