CAS 2012/A/2785 & 2790 Brazilian Equestrian National Federation (BENF), Federacion Dominicana de Deportes Ecuestres (FDDE), Yvonne Losos de Muniz v. Brazilian Equestrian National Federation (BENF), Federacion Dominicana de Deportes Ecuestres (FDDE), Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI), Luiza Tavares de Almeida
Court of Arbitration for Sport · Sports (CAS) · International (Switzerland) · 22/10/2012
Why it matters
Brazilian Equestrian National Federation (BENF), Federacion Dominicana de Deportes Ecuestres (FDDE), Yvonne Losos de Muniz v. Brazilian Equestrian National Federation (BENF), Federacion Dominicana de Deportes Ecuestres (FDDE), Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI), Luiza Tavares de Almeida, an eligibility dispute in equestrian decided by the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, the final tribunal of world sport. The Court held that the appeal was dismissed. For a student, it shows how CAS balances a federation's rules on who may compete against the athlete's rights.
Summary
Brazilian Equestrian National Federation (BENF), Federacion Dominicana de Deportes Ecuestres (FDDE), Yvonne Losos de Muniz v. Brazilian Equestrian National Federation (BENF), Federacion Dominicana de Deportes Ecuestres (FDDE), Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI), Luiza Tavares de Almeida: an eligibility dispute in equestrian before the Court of Arbitration for Sport, decided 22/10/2012. The Court held that the appeal was dismissed. The full award is available from CAS.
The detail
Parties: Brazilian Equestrian National Federation (BENF), Federacion Dominicana de Deportes Ecuestres (FDDE), Yvonne Losos de Muniz v. Brazilian Equestrian National Federation (BENF), Federacion Dominicana de Deportes Ecuestres (FDDE), Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI), Luiza Tavares de Almeida
Case number: CAS 2012/A/2785 & 2790
Outcome: Dismissed
Applicable law: The relevant federation regulations; Swiss law; the CAS Code.
Issues in play: an eligibility dispute
Read the full decision at Court of Arbitration for Sport ↗
Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.