CAS 2012/A/2756 James Armstrong v. World Curling Federation (WCF)
Court of Arbitration for Sport · Sports (CAS) · International (Switzerland) · 21/09/2012
Why it matters
James Armstrong v. World Curling Federation (WCF), an anti-doping case in curling decided by the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, the final tribunal of world sport. The Court held that the appeal was partially upheld. For a student, it shows how CAS applies the World Anti-Doping Code: the athlete bears a heavy burden to explain an adverse finding, and CAS reviews both the science and the sanction afresh.
Summary
James Armstrong v. World Curling Federation (WCF): an anti-doping case in curling before the Court of Arbitration for Sport, decided 21/09/2012. The Court held that the appeal was partially upheld. The full award is available from CAS.
The detail
Parties: James Armstrong v. World Curling Federation (WCF)
Case number: CAS 2012/A/2756
Outcome: Partially Upheld
Applicable law: The relevant federation regulations; Swiss law; the CAS Code.
Issues in play: an anti-doping case
Read the full decision at Court of Arbitration for Sport ↗
Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.