CAS 2009/A/2001 Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) v. Glen Williams, Lyle Clark, Nick Parr, Randall Martin
Court of Arbitration for Sport · Sports (CAS) · International (Switzerland) · 22/03/2010
Why it matters
Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) v. Glen Williams, Lyle Clark, Nick Parr, Randall Martin, an anti-doping case in life saving sport decided by the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, the final tribunal of world sport. The Court held that the appeal was upheld. For a student, it shows how CAS applies the World Anti-Doping Code: the athlete bears a heavy burden to explain an adverse finding, and CAS reviews both the science and the sanction afresh.
Summary
Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) v. Glen Williams, Lyle Clark, Nick Parr, Randall Martin: an anti-doping case in life saving sport before the Court of Arbitration for Sport, decided 22/03/2010. The Court held that the appeal was upheld. The full award is available from CAS.
The detail
Parties: Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) v. Glen Williams, Lyle Clark, Nick Parr, Randall Martin
Case number: CAS 2009/A/2001
Outcome: Upheld
Applicable law: The relevant federation regulations; Swiss law; the CAS Code.
Issues in play: an anti-doping case
Read the full decision at Court of Arbitration for Sport ↗
Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.