CAS 2008/A/1675 Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) v. Ariel Maximiliano Richeze, Union Ciclista Republica Argentina (UCRA)
Court of Arbitration for Sport · Sports (CAS) · International (Switzerland) · 07/04/2009
Why it matters
Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) v. Ariel Maximiliano Richeze, Union Ciclista Republica Argentina (UCRA), an anti-doping case in cycling decided by the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, the final tribunal of world sport. The Court held that the appeal was upheld. For a student, it shows how CAS applies the World Anti-Doping Code: the athlete bears a heavy burden to explain an adverse finding, and CAS reviews both the science and the sanction afresh.
Summary
Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) v. Ariel Maximiliano Richeze, Union Ciclista Republica Argentina (UCRA): an anti-doping case in cycling before the Court of Arbitration for Sport, decided 07/04/2009. The Court held that the appeal was upheld. The full award is available from CAS.
The detail
Parties: Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) v. Ariel Maximiliano Richeze, Union Ciclista Republica Argentina (UCRA)
Case number: CAS 2008/A/1675
Outcome: Upheld
Applicable law: The relevant federation regulations; Swiss law; the CAS Code.
Issues in play: an anti-doping case
Read the full decision at Court of Arbitration for Sport ↗
Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.