CAS 2008/A/1557 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. Comitato Olimpico Nazionale Italiano (CONI), Daniele Mannini, Davide Possanzini, Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC)
Court of Arbitration for Sport · Sports (CAS) · International (Switzerland) · 29/01/2009
Why it matters
World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. Comitato Olimpico Nazionale Italiano (CONI), Daniele Mannini, Davide Possanzini, Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC), an anti-doping case in football decided by the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, the final tribunal of world sport. The Court held that the appeal was partially upheld. For a student, it shows how CAS applies the World Anti-Doping Code: the athlete bears a heavy burden to explain an adverse finding, and CAS reviews both the science and the sanction afresh.
Summary
World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. Comitato Olimpico Nazionale Italiano (CONI), Daniele Mannini, Davide Possanzini, Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC): an anti-doping case in football before the Court of Arbitration for Sport, decided 29/01/2009. The Court held that the appeal was partially upheld. The full award is available from CAS.
The detail
Parties: World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. Comitato Olimpico Nazionale Italiano (CONI), Daniele Mannini, Davide Possanzini, Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC)
Case number: CAS 2008/A/1557
Outcome: Partially Upheld
Applicable law: The relevant federation regulations; Swiss law; the CAS Code.
Issues in play: an anti-doping case
Read the full decision at Court of Arbitration for Sport ↗
Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.