What is Locus Standi?

Locus Standi is a platform for the dispute-resolution world. It brings together arbitration, mediation and adjudication events, jobs and internships, and landmark arbitral awards explained in plain English, alongside the qualifications and pathways into the field. It was established in London at LIDW26 by the alumni of Queen Mary University of London.

Can Locus Standi help me understand a dispute?

Yes. Locus Standi offers free dispute help: paste your contract's dispute-resolution clause and a short note on what happened, and it works out the type of dispute, the governing law, your options, the right forum to file in, and drafts a basic document to start from, all in plain English.

What is the agentic AI case officer?

Locus Standi's workspace includes an AI case officer that helps practitioners run their matters: tracking stages and deadlines, raising alerts, organising to-dos and documents, and drafting. It is built for arbitrators, mediators and the institutions that administer disputes.

Where can I find arbitration events and internships?

Locus Standi keeps a live calendar of arbitration, mediation and adjudication events with one-tap calendar export, and a board of arbitration jobs and internships from institutions including the PCA, ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and AIAC.

CAS 1996/A/153 Kathryn Watt v. Australian Cycling Federation (ACF), Lucy Tyler-Sharman (Court of Arbitration for Sport)

Why it matters

Kathryn Watt v. Australian Cycling Federation (ACF), Lucy Tyler-Sharman, an eligibility dispute in cycling decided by the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, the final tribunal of world sport. The Court held that the appeal was upheld. For a student, it shows how CAS balances a federation's rules on who may compete against the athlete's rights.

Summary

Kathryn Watt v. Australian Cycling Federation (ACF), Lucy Tyler-Sharman: an eligibility dispute in cycling before the Court of Arbitration for Sport, decided 22/07/1996. The Court held that the appeal was upheld. The full award is available from CAS.

The detail

Parties: Kathryn Watt v. Australian Cycling Federation (ACF), Lucy Tyler-Sharman

Case number: CAS 1996/A/153

Outcome: Upheld

Applicable law: The relevant federation regulations; Swiss law; the CAS Code.

Issues in play: an eligibility dispute

Read the full decision at Court of Arbitration for Sport ↗

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board