What is Locus Standi?

Locus Standi is a platform for the dispute-resolution world. It brings together arbitration, mediation and adjudication events, jobs and internships, and landmark arbitral awards explained in plain English, alongside the qualifications and pathways into the field. It was established in London at LIDW26 by the alumni of Queen Mary University of London.

Can Locus Standi help me understand a dispute?

Yes. Locus Standi offers free dispute help: paste your contract's dispute-resolution clause and a short note on what happened, and it works out the type of dispute, the governing law, your options, the right forum to file in, and drafts a basic document to start from, all in plain English.

What is the agentic AI case officer?

Locus Standi's workspace includes an AI case officer that helps practitioners run their matters: tracking stages and deadlines, raising alerts, organising to-dos and documents, and drafting. It is built for arbitrators, mediators and the institutions that administer disputes.

Where can I find arbitration events and internships?

Locus Standi keeps a live calendar of arbitration, mediation and adjudication events with one-tap calendar export, and a board of arbitration jobs and internships from institutions including the PCA, ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC and AIAC.

Astaldi S.p.A. v. Republic of Honduras (ICSID)

Why it matters

This case illustrates ICSID's jurisdiction over contract-based disputes involving state entities and the application of FIDIC-type clauses in public works contracts. It also shows the tribunal's approach to evaluating multiple claims for extra work, delays, and price adjustments, setting a precedent for similar infrastructure disputes in Honduras.

Summary

Astaldi, an Italian construction company, contracted with Honduras to improve a highway. During execution, Astaldi faced delays, extra work, and cost increases due to site conditions, third-party actions, and government decisions. It submitted a claim for compensation, which the government partially rejected. After conciliation failed, Astaldi initiated ICSID arbitration under the contract's arbitration clause. The sole arbitrator, Eduardo Sancho González, rejected Honduras' jurisdictional challenge and proceeded to the merits. The tribunal analyzed eight claims: (1) costs for river diversion, overhauls, idle equipment, and acceleration; (2) sub-excavation; (3) additive for asphalt; (4) borrow pit; (5) fuel price increases; (6) asphalt repair; (7) wage adjustments; (8) final quantities. Applying the contract and Honduran law, the tribunal granted claims 1-6 and 8, finding that Astaldi had proven the extra work and costs, but denied claim 7 for wage adjustments due to lack of evidence. Honduras was ordered to pay the claimed amounts in both Lempiras and US Dollars, plus interest at 12% (Lempiras) and 4% (USD) from May 4, 2007, and costs. The award was rendered in Spanish and sent to parties on September 17, 2010.

The detail

Parties: Astaldi S.p.A. v. Republic of Honduras

Case number: ICSID Case No. ARB/07/32

Outcome: Award partially in favor of Astaldi; Honduras ordered to pay specified amounts for claims 1-6 and 8, plus interest and costs.

Quantum: LPS 15,923,964.63 and US$ 5,569,148.06 in principal, plus interest and costs

Applicable law: Contract for Improvement of CA-5-Norte Highway, Taulabe-La Barca; ICSID Convention; Honduran law (Ley de Contratación del Estado); FIDIC-based contract conditions.

Issues in play: Contract interpretation and compensation for variations and unforeseen events under Honduran public procurement law and the contract's clauses on adjustments and claims.

Read the full decision at italaw ↗

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board