Arbitration decision (arb7090)
ICSID · Investment (ICSID and treaty) · International · 25 May 2018
Why it matters
Douglas QC LEAUA & ASOCIATII Gabriel Resources et al. v. Romania The Respondent, an investment arbitration in which the claimant brought claims against the respondent state under an investment treaty or contract. For a student, it is an example of investor-state dispute settlement: how an arbitral tribunal weighs a state's conduct against the protections owed to a foreign investor, with any damages set out in the award.
Summary
Douglas QC LEAUA & ASOCIATII Gabriel Resources et al. v. Romania The Respondent: an investment arbitration award from the arbitration.org collection. The tribunal's full reasoning is set out in the original.
The detail
Parties: Douglas QC LEAUA & ASOCIATII Gabriel Resources et al. v. Romania The Respondent
Case number: See arbitration.org record
Outcome: Decision. The disposition is set out in the original.
Applicable law: The applicable arbitration rules and governing law; see the original.
Issues in play: The parties' substantive dispute, resolved by arbitration rather than in the courts.
Read the full decision at arbitration.org ↗
Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.