Award

25-01927 Yiqun Lu v. Alan Silbert, Ian Epstein, Kimberly Neely, Nicholas Thadaney, Vlad Uchenik, INX Securities, LLC, Opendeal Broker LLC

FINRA Dispute Resolution Services · Securities (FINRA) · United States · September 14, 2025

Why it matters

Yiqun Lu v. Alan Silbert, Ian Epstein, Kimberly Neely, Nicholas Thadaney, Vlad Uchenik, INX Securities, LLC, Opendeal Broker LLC, decided in FINRA arbitration. In this case a customer or associated person brought a claim against Alan Silbert, Ian Epstein, Kimberly Neely, Nicholas Thadaney, Vlad Uchenik, INX Securities, LLC, Opendeal Broker LLC. For a student, it shows how FINRA arbitration works: the binding, largely private forum where the great majority of US securities disputes are resolved instead of the courts, with awards enforceable in court and open to challenge only on narrow grounds.

Summary

Yiqun Lu v. Alan Silbert, Ian Epstein, Kimberly Neely, Nicholas Thadaney, Vlad Uchenik, INX Securities, LLC, Opendeal Broker LLC: a FINRA arbitration award (case 25-01927), 05/22/2026. The panel's decision is set out in the award.

The detail

Parties: Yiqun Lu v. Alan Silbert, Ian Epstein, Kimberly Neely, Nicholas Thadaney, Vlad Uchenik, INX Securities, LLC, Opendeal Broker LLC

Case number: FINRA Case No. 25-01927

Outcome: See the original for the panel's decision.

Applicable law: FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure; United States securities law; the parties' brokerage agreement.

Issues in play: An investor's or an industry member's claim, decided in FINRA's arbitration forum rather than the courts.

Read the full decision at FINRA Arbitration Awards Online

Locus Standi links to the source decision and publishes its own plain-language summary. It does not reproduce the text of the award.

Back to the awards board